Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)

Fair Value Measurements (Note)

v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements (Note)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Fair value assumptions are made at a specific point in time and changes in underlying assumptions could significantly affect these estimates. HSNi applies the following framework for measuring fair value which is based on a three-level hierarchy:
Level 1—Valuations based on quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.
Level 2—Valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3—Valuations based on unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other market participants. These valuations require significant judgment.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these items. The following table summarizes the fair value of HSNi's other financial assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Total Fair Value and Carrying Value on Balance Sheet
 
Fair Value Measurement Category
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap
 
$
574

 
$

 
$
574

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
 
1,032

 

 

 
1,032


 
December 31, 2012
 
 
Total Fair Value and Carrying Value on Balance Sheet
 
Fair Value Measurement Category
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap
 
$
755

 
$

 
$
755

 
$

Contingent consideration
 
6,832

 

 

 
6,832


HSNi's interest rate swap was carried on the balance sheet at fair value as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The swap was entered into for the purpose of hedging the variability of interest expense and interest payments on HSNi's long-term variable rate debt. Because this swap is not actively traded, the fair value was based on a valuation model. Interest rate yield curves and credit spreads are the significant inputs included in the valuation model. These inputs are observable in active markets (level 2 criteria). HSNi considers credit risk associated with its own standing as well as the credit standing of any counterparties involved in the valuation of its financial instruments.

In connection with the 2012 acquisition of Chasing Fireflies, the purchase price included contingent consideration of $7.8 million. Based on achieving specific annual performance targets or a cumulative three-year performance target, the sellers can receive payments in each of the three years following the acquisition up to a maximum total payout of $7.8 million . The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration at the date of acquisition was $6.5 million and was included as part of the purchase price allocation. HSNi determined the fair value of the contingent consideration based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow approach (level 3 criteria). Key inputs used in this calculation included estimates related to each of the three year's operating performance. In each period, HSNi reassesses its current estimates of performance relative to the stated targets and adjusts the liability to fair value. Performance targets were achieved for the year ended December 31, 2012; therefore, a payment of $2.6 million was paid to the sellers in 2013.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, performance targets were not achieved. As a result, during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2013, HSNi determined Chasing Fireflies is also less likely to achieve the necessary performance targets in 2014 to earn the full amount of the contingent consideration. Therefore, HSNi adjusted the fair value of the contingent consideration in the fourth quarter of 2013 to $1.0 million, a decrease of $3.6 million. HSNi also recognized a fair value adjustment of $3.0 million for indefinite-lived intangible assets related to the acquisition of Chasing Fireflies. The fair value of the intangible assets, consisting of trademarks and trade names, was determined using the relief from royalty method (level 3 criteria). Key inputs used in this calculation included revenue growth, discount, royalty and terminal growth rates. The net impact of the impairment charge and the contingent consideration adjustment was a reduction of expense of $0.6 million and is included in "General and administrative expense" in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The change in the fair value of the contingent consideration liability is summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
2013
 
2012
Beginning of the year
$
6,832

 
$

Fair value of contingent consideration issued

 
6,500

Accretion
383

 
332

Payments
(2,583
)
 

Fair value adjustments
(3,600
)
 

End of the year
$
1,032

 
$
6,832

 
 
 
 


The following table summarizes the fair value of HSNi’s financial assets and liabilities which are carried at cost (in thousands):

 
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair Value
 
Fair Value Measurement Category
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Term Loan
 
$
240,625

 
$
240,625

 
$

 
$
240,625

 
$

 
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair Value
 
Fair Value Measurement Category
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Term Loan
 
$
250,000

 
$
250,000

 
$

 
$
250,000

 
$


The fair value of the term loan was estimated by discounting expected cash flows at the rates currently offered to HSNi for debt of the same remaining maturities, as advised by HSNi's bankers (level 2 criteria).

HSNi measures certain assets, such as property and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets, at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These assets are recognized at fair value if they are deemed to be impaired. On July 1, 2012, substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of The Territory Ahead were sold. An impairment charge of $5.9 million was recorded in the second quarter of 2012 to reduce the carrying value of the net assets to their estimated net realizable value based on the known selling price of $1.1 million and the estimated costs to sell the business. See Note 17 for further discussion of the sale of The Territory Ahead. There were no other fair value adjustments to the carrying values of HSNi's property and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets during December 31, 2013 or 2012.